When thinking about the learning environment, good trainers must consider many variables including seating arrangements. Having the proper seating arrangement can impact everything from group dynamics to comfort and visibility.
Hopefully you instruct in a setting, where the seating can be modified to enhance the learning environment. I have seen some instances, in computer labs for example, where the seating can’t be modified or altered. In that instance, you just have to make the most of a not-so-ideal situation.
However, for those of you who have the luxury of arranging your seating, the following list provides some scenarios you might encounter in the classroom, and may influence decisions when it comes to making seating arrangements.
- Distance usually reduces participation (e.g. learners sitting the back of the class are less likely to participate than those sitting in the front).
- Arranging the seating in any type of row has a tendency to limit interaction.
- Friends or co-workers attending the same training will usually sit together.
- Difficult or “prisoner” learners usually sit as far away from the instructor as possible.
To combat the last two scenarios, I’ve found that a table switch may be necessary. If you do change the table groups, I’d recommend facilitating a quick icebreaker to lessen the shock of moving to a new table and working with different participants. After all, you’ve just altered the group dynamics.
When it comes to the arrangement of the actual tables and chairs, there are several options to choose from, each with its own set of pros and cons. Here are a few to consider:
Rounds or “Bistro” style
(Note: This is Langevin’s most preferred arrangement)
- Pros: informal; encourages maximum participation in a true workshop setting.
- Cons: may encourage sidebar conversations; group may form its own identity, which could be different and counterproductive from the overall group.
Horseshoe or “U” shape
- Pros: typically good visibility among all participants; trainer can “work the middle” in regard to movement and circulation during the training presentation.
- Cons: somewhat formal and business-like; rear row of participants is farther away from audiovisuals (which could prove to be problematic if audiovisuals are small).
Theater
- Pros: good for “lecture only” presentations; usually most suitable for large groups.
- Cons: limits learner participation; limits interaction between trainer and participants.
Keeping these scenarios and considerations in mind and letting common sense be your guide will help to ensure a seating arrangement that adds to that positive learning environment that we all strive for in the classroom. For more ideas about seating arrangements as well as other great tips for trainers, check out our New Trainer’s Survival Kit. Best of luck!
Langevin Team
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Comments RSS